Re:El Salvador abandons Bitcoin as legal tender after failed...
by antihipocrat on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:11PM
(#42926035)
Legal tender does not have to be a mandatory means of exchange.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:El Salvador abandons Bitcoin as legal tender after failed...
by abduhl on Monday February 03, 2025 @11:10PM
(#42927812)
That is actually the defining characteristic of legal tender: “money that is legally valid for the payment of debts and that must be accepted for that purpose when offered”
Re:El Salvador abandons Bitcoin as legal tender after failed...
by antihipocrat on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @02:51AM
(#42929406)
Thanks, you're right and I was totally wrong. I'd delete my comment if I could
Re:El Salvador abandons Bitcoin as legal tender after failed...
by rsynnott on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @06:50AM
(#42931192)
Its status in El Salvador was actually a bit more than _just_ legal tender; merchants were _required_ to accept it.
For instance, the euro is legal tender in the eurozone. I can pay a tax bill or a bank loan with 10cent coins, and technically they have to accept that (though note that some countries do have special rules around whether small change is legal tender). However, a merchant is not required to take my wheelbarrow full of 10cent coins in exchange for goods and services; no debt exists before the purchase.
El Salvador was forcing the merchant to take the wheelbarrow.