Re:So you want to offer a public API …
by qw on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @12:33PM
(#4291692)
I can see that using "Accept" can be considered a more elegant solution, I don't see how adding a parameter will break HTTP. There is nothing in the HTTP standard that says what an URL should or should not return. The Accept-header is just an additional source of information.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:So you want to offer a public API …
by MatthewPhillips on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @03:15PM
(#4292503)
Not actually, the Accept header isn't a mere suggestion. If the server chooses not to fulfill it, the correct response is 406 Not Acceptable. This is why browsers send something like this in their Accept header:
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,/;q=0.8
This says "we would prefer one of these formats, but we'll take whatever you got".