Re:Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using...
by trevor-e on Sunday February 02, 2025 @10:49PM
(#42914748)
Because there are plenty of devs who take the output, actually read if it makes sense, do a code review, iterate back and forth with it a few times, and then finally check in the result. It's just a tool. Shitty devs will make shitty code regardless of the tool. And good devs are insanely productive with good tools. In your example what's the difference with that dev just copy/pasting from StackOverflow?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using...
by DustinBrett on Sunday February 02, 2025 @11:44PM
(#42915073)
Because on SO someone real wrote it with a real reason and logic. With AI we still need to double check that what we are giving ever made any sense. And SO also has votes to show the validty.
I agree if devs iterated over the results it could be good, but that has not been what I have been seeing.
It is not a traditional tool because tools we had in the past had expected results.
Re:Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using...
by eru on Sunday February 02, 2025 @11:26PM
(#42914981)
Agreed!
To go off on a tangent: yes, good developers can produce good code faster. And bad developers can produce bad code faster (and perhaps slightly better than before, because the models are mostly a bit smarter than copy-and-paste is).
Everyone potentially benefits, but it won't suddenly turn all bad programmers into great programmers.