News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Waydroid – Android in a Linux container by OsrsNeedsf2P on Sunday February 02, 2025 @07:38PM (#42913499)
What's the difference between FuriLabs and all the other Linux phones that have 1 hour of battery life and no app support?
Re:Waydroid – Android in a Linux container by yjftsjthsd-h on Sunday February 02, 2025 @09:05PM (#42914146)
> all the other Linux phones that have 1 hour of battery life and no app support?

... Which phones would that be? Even the original pinephone exceeds an hour and has a pretty good collection of apps even without compatibility layers.

Re:Waydroid – Android in a Linux container by jaidan on Sunday February 02, 2025 @10:20PM (#42914550)
FLX1 is fast. It’s useful. It has regular updates that improve experience. Battery lasts 1.5 days with moderate usage.
Re:Waydroid – Android in a Linux container by seabass-labrax on Monday February 03, 2025 @05:40AM (#42916897)
Indeed; I have an original PinePhone (convergence edition) and the battery is not half bad while you are using it. I think the main issue has been poor software support for wake-from-suspend, which prevented the phone from saving power when not in use. I believe that these issues have been largely resolved in the latest versions of PostmarketOS, Mobian etc.
Re:Waydroid – Android in a Linux container by Arnavion on Monday February 03, 2025 @12:01PM (#42920302)
FYI, going to suspend / receiving calls during suspend / waking from suspend haven't been a general problem on the (non-Pro) PinePhone since 2021. You just have to make sure to switch to the FOSS modem firmware, and occasionally there are regressions (the most recent one being https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager... ).
Re:Waydroid – Android in a Linux container by stonogo on Monday February 03, 2025 @03:41AM (#42916188)
FuriLabs' phone runs libhybris (OEM android kernel) instead of attempting a native port. Hardware enablement is outsourced.