News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CDC orders mass retraction of research across all science... by Qwertious on Sunday February 02, 2025 @12:18AM (#42906109)
The implication of the term is that there are other contexts for "male" or "female" other than "biologically". If "non-woke" contexts assume that male/female are inherently biological terms, then "biologically [male/female" is obviously "woke".
Re:CDC orders mass retraction of research across all science... by technothrasher on Sunday February 02, 2025 @08:14AM (#42908426)
Your second sentence is tautological, and also begging the question.
Re:CDC orders mass retraction of research across all science... by pests on Sunday February 02, 2025 @11:18PM (#42914927)
I don't see the implication. How is it obviously woke?
Re:CDC orders mass retraction of research across all science... by Qwertious on Monday February 10, 2025 @03:04AM (#42997924)
It acknowledges trans people exist. And I put the word "woke" in quotes, because it's stupid and it's not my word.