Re:Bzip3: A better and stronger spiritual successor to BZip2
by eqvinox on Saturday February 01, 2025 @06:35PM
(#42903721)
Did you confuse gzip and xz? You mention numbers from xz and then suddenly talk about gzip? These two are not related…
Re:Bzip3: A better and stronger spiritual successor to BZip2
by alkh on Saturday February 01, 2025 @07:23PM
(#42904090)
Hey, I didn't confuse them but I guess I should have been more specific. I've addressed 2 main points in my text. 1) In my opinion, for the vast majority of cases you don't need to be worried about comparability, as you can easily install better alternatives to gzip for platforms a lot of people use. 2) I think zstd can become a primary replacement for gzip due to its high speed of compression and good compression ratio, even when compared to such great algorithms like xz/lzma. Sacrificing some compression ratio for (de)compression speed is worth it, for me at least
Re:Bzip3: A better and stronger spiritual successor to BZip2
by dist-epoch on Sunday February 02, 2025 @05:40AM
(#42907800)
zstandard at level 21 with some tweaked parameters (larger dictionaries) will give you xz/lzma compression ratios, while still being faster.
The majority of OS that people use either have it installed or can be trivially downloaded to, so I see no point in using gzip nowadays, unless it is mandated by API