Well here’s what you said:

> Considering a candidates suitability for a role based on their race, gender, or sexual orientation is the opposite merit based selection.

> You haven't addressed what I said. You've identified a problem (let's just assume you are correct about the problem for arguments sake). I've pointed out the problem with current "solution": making decisions about individuals based on their race, sexual orientation or gender seems far from good, but you haven't addressed that.

I didn’t think there was anything to address. I think you defined the ideal we are meant to achieve.

If this is a question on whether things should be fair - yes we are in agreement on principles.

I want a fair system, for everyone.