News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with executive or... by tome on Friday January 31, 2025 @08:20AM (#42887372)
> > Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

> > There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

But this is completely false. The credulousness with which it gets repeated is telling.

Re:NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with executive or... by deeg on Friday January 31, 2025 @11:10AM (#42888918)
Before the rise of Trump I might have agreed with you but now I think it's true for trumpers. Look at Musk, Mr. Free Speech until he doesn't like it. The quote above describes him exactly.
Re:NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with executive or... by tome on Friday January 31, 2025 @11:38AM (#42889163)
On what basis do you declare Elon Musk "conservative"? (No less, the one man whose actions define conservatism!) Are you perhaps confusing conservatism with "current support of a Republican politician"?

I agree with you regarding Musk's hypocrisy around free speech.

Oh, and if you're looking for someone who believes the law protects him but does not bind him, you might like to read the news on the current (Democratic) mayor of Chicago.

Re:NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with executive or... by deeg on Friday January 31, 2025 @03:40PM (#42891696)
Musk is a major component of the administration that currently represents conservatives. He is/was the biggest donor to that administration. That makes him a conservative for now.

I live in Massachusetts where three straight Speakers were convicted of various crimes so I'm well aware of Democratic malfeasance. Right now Trump and his enablers are so much worse.

Re:NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with executive or... by mindslight on Friday January 31, 2025 @03:42PM (#42891725)
The problem is that the word "conservative" has become so overloaded as to become useless, both as a punching bag (the above quote, which would be better stated as authoritarian or even more appropriately crypto-fascist), and as a fig-leaf for the radical reactionary agenda that has taken over the Republican party. The actual straightforward definition of wishing to slow change, supporting American institutions, the rule of law, fiscal responsibility, etc, actually applies more to the current Democratic party.

Musk's hypocrisy regarding "free speech" is more around him being thought of as a libertarian, but that type of hypocrisy runs deep in the Libertarian party (which has been pwnt by moneyed interests the same as the two main parties), as the attraction of freedom for me but not for thee is too strong.