Nuclear fusion: it's time for a reality check

Re:Nuclear fusion: it's time for a reality check by pfdietz on Friday January 31, 2025 @07:29AM (#42886992)

It's your job to present a convincing argument for your position.

You cannot show any good evidence for it, though. You can merely assert correlation (if a bad one, given that nuclear was in trouble long before TMI or Chernobyl).

It's clear what's going on here: the actual situation, that nuclear has failed economically, is completely unacceptable to you, so you are confabulating a fantasy that something else caused nuclear's troubles. It's wishful denial of reality to preserve the illusion that your energy waifu has any chance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclear fusion: it's time for a reality check by wqaatwt on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @08:18AM (#42931932)

> nuclear has failed economically, is completely unacceptable to you

Surely you must be trolling? Or you just can’t read? How many times did I repeat that?

> It's wishful denial of reality

I mean you are literally looking and what I wrote and seeing words that are not there.

[ Parent | on HN ]