News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:sixos: A nix OS without systemd [video] by likeabatterycar on Friday January 31, 2025 @04:01AM (#42885897)
> It is only your opinion that it is better to have "buggy" networking than to have "not buggy" networking that you think is difficult to configure. That is the exact opposite of "objectively."

I never said this.

Fix the bugs. Don't fill the well with yet another equally shite solution.

Re:sixos: A nix OS without systemd [video] by geocar on Saturday February 01, 2025 @09:57AM (#42898774)
> > It is only your opinion that it is better to have "buggy" networking than to have "not buggy" networking that you think is difficult to configure. That is the exact opposite of "objectively."

> I never said this.

I know you didn't say it was your opinion. You said it was objectively worse. You said:

> What is objectively worse than buggy networking in systemd is having 26 different incompatible ways to configure networking in Linux.

and I think it's pretty clear people have experiences where systemd-network malfunctions in places where a rc.local (one of those 26 incompatible ways) works fine.

That is not objectively worse. So it's only your opinion.

> Fix the bugs.

You can fix your own bugs.

> Don't fill the well with yet another equally shite solution.

Do not confuse some fantasy future version of systemd that has had people like me work on it to make it better, despite its many many issues, with the rc.local script that exists today: Only one of these has a chance of existing.

Re:sixos: A nix OS without systemd [video] by LargoLasskhyfv on Sunday February 02, 2025 @04:54AM (#42907587)
> Only one of these has a chance of existing.

Fascist