News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by weddpros on Thursday January 30, 2025 @09:08PM (#42884128)
Let's remember, it's not just about privacy, it's privacy against government overreach. Those in power, whether government officials or public servants, often abuse it.

The public might want to defend their privacy vs. corporations, and/because the media will spin privacy to target companies, while government and public servants escape accountability for their actions.

Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by cratermoon on Friday January 31, 2025 @12:23AM (#42884927)
Since when have corporations been accountable for their actions?
Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by burningChrome on Friday January 31, 2025 @01:57AM (#42885248)
I remember a pretty big class action lawsuit against Phillip Morris and "Big Tobacco"?

The BP Oil Spill class action?

The Anderson Family class action against GM?

The VW emissions scandal?

Enron Securities fraud case?

WorldCom accounting fraud case?

Fen-Phen diet drug settlement?

Bank of America Countrywide Mortgage fraud case?

Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by cratermoon on Friday January 31, 2025 @05:01PM (#42892698)
And what were the typical penalties imposed for these incidents?
Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by weddpros on Friday January 31, 2025 @07:59PM (#42894486)
Asked Perplexity to summarize and answer to you:

Tobacco litigation ($23.6B)

BP oil spill ($20.8B)

VW emissions scandal ($38B)

Enron/WorldCom financial fraud ($9.55B combined)

Pharmaceutical/auto/mortgage cases ($16.15B combined)

Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by cratermoon on Friday January 31, 2025 @11:12PM (#42895571)
Get back to me when you can provide real sources, not some hallucinatin' jumped-up stochastic parrot.
Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by weddpros on Saturday February 01, 2025 @06:54PM (#42903880)
Go to perplexity, learn a thing and use the sources it provides with its results.

Then see for yourself who's the parrot with no sources.

Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by cratermoon on Saturday February 01, 2025 @10:39PM (#42905569)
I would like to note that even if completely accurate, there's a curious lack of tech companies in that list.
Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by weddpros on Friday January 31, 2025 @04:25AM (#42886046)
Remember the multiple times tech companies have been fined for failing to "protect privacy"?

Do you remember of any agency having any kind of trouble after leaking private data? It's always the hackers that are to blame when there's a data leak in a government agency.

But when there's a hack at a company? the blame seems to go 100% on the company.

Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by franga2000 on Friday January 31, 2025 @05:44AM (#42886479)
Are you reading the same news the rest of us are? Companies are basically never found liable for a "hack" into their systems. And when the companies share user data intentionally, at worst they get a fine so low as to be meaningless. And in the US, usually not even that, because selling user data is mostly legal.

What usually happens in cases of government agencies getting hacked (in my non-US experience) is that an inspector investigates what went wrong, proposes improvements to security systems and processes, then monitors the agency to make sure they carry them out.

Re:California law enforcement misused state databases more t... by cratermoon on Friday January 31, 2025 @07:51PM (#42894430)
> Remember the multiple times tech companies have been fined for failing to "protect privacy"?

I can recall one or two exceptional cases,and the fines were relatively small, amounting to a slap on the wrist. For example for the 2017 Equifax breach, after 2 years, the total cost of the settlement included $300 million to a fund for victim compensation, $175 million to the states and territories in the agreement, and $100 million to the CFPB in fines. In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority imposed a financial penalty of £11,164,400[1]

Equifax's revenue in 2017 was $3.362B. In 2019, after Equifax agreed to the above settlement, revenue was up to $3.508B. Equifax revenue for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was $5.588B, a 8.79% increase year-over-year.[2]

1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Equifax_data_breach#Litig...

2. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/EFX/equifax/revenu...