News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by jfengel on Thursday January 30, 2025 @08:42AM (#42877559)
Because I live here.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by cjaybo on Thursday January 30, 2025 @09:55AM (#42878323)
I also live here but that doesn’t give me crystal ball-like insight into what every single fed and fed-adjacent employee is feeling. It’s a fairly big city! Do you work in the federal space? I have acquaintances who do and their mood doesn’t quite match the hysteria you see on e.g. the regional subreddits.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by beedeebeedee on Thursday January 30, 2025 @10:27AM (#42878625)
I live far away from DC, but my friends in two different federal agencies (stationed outside of DC) are partly bemused and partly shocked at how unprofessional the emails and new directives they are receiving from this new administration are. All of their colleagues are expressing the same sentiment (and my friends usually do not fraternize after work with their colleagues, but they have all been doing that after work just to cope with what is going on). Your contrarian-ness about the 'hysteria' is misplaced. Professional and dedicated federal workers are deeply concerned.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by naasking on Thursday January 30, 2025 @11:01AM (#42878973)
I have no stake here, but I'll just point out that "professional" can also be interpreted as "entrenched norms that led to waste and diffusion of responsibility", and "dedicated" can be code for "vested interest spinning the wheels that have been going nowhere". These are features of any large organization, not just government. Any disruption that seeks to destroy such wasteful norms by refocusing on direct language and meaningful goals will look "unprofessional" to "dedicated" workers.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by beedeebeedee on Thursday January 30, 2025 @11:25AM (#42879292)
> I have no stake here

I don't want to sound flippant, but if you have no familiarity with a system and what it does, then you won't be able to make any useful judgments about it. This new administration has made it clear that they do not know the function of these agencies but have decided to destroy their structures. As a concerned bystander who has some knowledge and stake in them continuing to function, it is deeply painful to witness

Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by naasking on Thursday January 30, 2025 @12:10PM (#42879762)
That's a totally reasonable opinion, I'm just pointing out that "professional and dedicated" workers being concerned is not evidence of anything because it has many possible interpretations. Only if you've already bought into a particular system being well designed and justified does it necessarily entail something negative.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by dboreham on Thursday January 30, 2025 @12:42PM (#42880070)
This may be true, but it doesn't excuse psychopathic behavior on the part of public servants given the job of managing these agencies. This isn't supposed to be The Hunger Games.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by jrs235 on Thursday January 30, 2025 @12:59PM (#42880269)
They're blindly and foolishly tearing down Chesterton's fence.
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by alistairSH on Thursday January 30, 2025 @10:48AM (#42878841)
Damn near every one I know is either worried about being fired OR is unclear on what their agency should be doing in light of the flurry of ambiguous EOs from Trump. The best case seems to be "my office is clusterfuck, but I'm a contractor in SCIF, so I guess I'm ok for now."
Re:Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near R... by jjtheblunt on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:10PM (#42881036)
So basically you don't know, but are being dramatic. NSA and CIA and DoD in general?

The reason i say this is you mention experience and skill but ignore whether such people are in _roles_ that need to exist at all, which is what is being questioned, not the worth of individuals in those roles.