News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by mmaunder on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @08:48PM (#42873827)
Posturing huh? Nice. That was intended to be helpful. Go read the CFAA. What they did is, believe it or not, illegal. I didn't make the law, and many think the CFAA is ridiculous, but that's how it works. If you even access a computer system beyond what you've been granted it's a CFAA violation with stiff penalties.
Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by BoorishBears on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @08:55PM (#42873880)
Quite the posturing with that last sentence
Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by mmaunder on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @09:01PM (#42873914)
omg dude it literally says that in the code: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by ziddoap on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @09:33PM (#42874146)
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-announces-...

>The Department of Justice today announced the revision of its policy regarding charging violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

The policy for the first time directs that good-faith security research should not be charged. Good faith security research means accessing a computer solely for purposes of good-faith testing, investigation, and/or correction of a security flaw or vulnerability, where such activity is carried out in a manner designed to avoid any harm to individuals or the public, and where the information derived from the activity is used primarily to promote the security or safety of the class of devices, machines, or online services to which the accessed computer belongs, or those who use such devices, machines, or online services.

Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by mdaniel on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @10:58PM (#42874680)
AIUI "policy" is not "law," and are subject to the whims of the current leadership in the DoJ

Then again, it's my opinion that "law" isn't "law" if one has enough lawyers

Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by soulofmischief on Thursday January 30, 2025 @01:44AM (#42875515)
You're correct, this is not so black and white as you originally established. Glad you came around!

And yes, it's posturing if you wax on from such a pedestal without even reading the first paragraph of the article, which addresses your legitimate concerns.

Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by archon810 on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:32AM (#42875740)
You're not replying to the original poster. It's a different commenter.
Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by soulofmischief on Thursday January 30, 2025 @08:59AM (#42877685)
Thank you, my mistake!
Re:Exposed DeepSeek database leaking sensitive information, ... by ergl on Thursday January 30, 2025 @04:37AM (#42876343)
Would a law specific to the United States apply when you're probing a Chinese company?