Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source
by seberino on Thursday January 30, 2025 @10:29AM
(#42878646)
Wow. Your link is frustrating because I thought everything was under the
MIT license. Why did people claim it is MIT licensed if they sneaked in this additional license?
Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source
by orra on Friday January 31, 2025 @03:31AM
(#42885727)
So, the older DeepSeek-V3 model weights are sadly not permissively licensed.
But the recent DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1 have MIT licensed weights.
Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source
by seberino on Saturday February 01, 2025 @10:48AM
(#42899248)
Thank you very much. That was helpful. Do we need the older model weights
to use the recent DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1 models?
Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source
by orra on Sunday February 02, 2025 @07:26AM
(#42908226)
I can't be 100% certain, but I think the good news is: no. There seem to be the exact same number of safetensor files for both, and AFAICT the file sizes are identical.
https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/tree/main https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1/tree/main
It is a bit more permissive than Llama's it seems (no MAU threshold it seems).