On DeepSeek and Export Controls

Re:On DeepSeek and Export Controls by pavl- on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @12:16PM (#42867934)

Unless the author makes a compelling case about why AI breaks the MAD status-quo between nuclear powers, I will assume that their appeals to NATSEC are an attempt to artificially create moat for their company.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On DeepSeek and Export Controls by highfrequency on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @12:47PM (#42868437)

I also find it counterintuitively reassuring that we have already had the power to blow up the planet for decades. But at least in theory - GPT10 level AI could help develop missile defense systems that actually work at scale, which would eliminate the MAD status quo, no?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On DeepSeek and Export Controls by mistercheph on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @01:54PM (#42869411)

What about the missile guidance / launch systems it could develop? The question at the at the limit of development becomes is nuclear warfare slightly attacker biased or slightly defender biased?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On DeepSeek and Export Controls by superq on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @01:02PM (#42868662)

AI is potentially so much deeper than MAD status quo.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On DeepSeek and Export Controls by flashman on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @07:35PM (#42873340)

I imagine that argument is a pretty easy sell. Of course governments will want to create moats that protect their incumbents.

[ Parent | on HN ]