Then I guess I don't understand the point you are trying to make. Are you saying that the problem is unsolvable and people should just accept that?
My point is that LMM is a tool, and we should never attribute any sort of blame to our tools. The blame should always be with the humans.
My example was absurd on purpose, I didn't want to bring an example where people could respond with "well, actually..."
But in the real world that is rarely the case, imagine substituting "astrology book" for "Bible/Quran/..." Would that be considered a legitimate source of sentence guidance? I'm sure people would spend years arguing about that...
As a society we need to understand that LLM hallucination is no different than a bloom filter giving you a false-positive.