It doesn't matter to you how completely irrelevant global copyright law is to OpenAI? [1]
[1] https://futurism.com/the-byte/openai-copyrighted-material-pa...
Re:The Illustrated DeepSeek-R1
by redcobra762 on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @02:36PM
(#42856881)
No, but then again I didn't claim copyright law mattered to me at all, you did.
I also said:
> The bottom line though is that nobody is innocent in that regard.
In other words, that bird has flown and it isn't a valid reason to choose one model over another.
Re:The Illustrated DeepSeek-R1
by redcobra762 on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @03:31PM
(#42857565)
Except you said it was worth caring about! I agree with what you wrote here, but I thought we were talking about this because you had concerns about OpenAI's disrespect for copyright.
Hey just wanna say I was sick yesterday, so if I was a schmuck I apologize. I think we actually agree on most of the things, and even as I was posting responses I was like, "... there's something hypocritical here but I can't quite see it." So again, my apologies.
Re:The Illustrated DeepSeek-R1
by CamperBob2 on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @03:19PM
(#42857433)
It doesn't matter to the Chinese, and that's all that matters.
To the extent that training a model with copyrighted material infringes copyright, copyright law has to change. There is no other point of view. Disagreement means forfeiting a very important game before it even begins.
That’s such a weirdly specific application of a moral principle, it’s hard to believe.