News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Open-R1: an open reproduction of DeepSeek-R1. Parent comment

Re:Open-R1: an open reproduction of DeepSeek-R1 by numba888 on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @05:15AM (#42850742)
> current LLMs would likely give better verdicts

He probably meant _brainwashed_ LLMs. They can consistently produce desired results if you wash them the right way. It's more about personal opinion than computation. Actually it would be fun to manipulate verdicts with prompt injections ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Open-R1: an open reproduction of DeepSeek-R1 by jampekka on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @08:12AM (#42851912)
Judges are very much "brainwashed" too, and by design. The judges should apply the law, and the same case should ideally lead to the same verdict regardless of the judge.

With the caveat that this applies to sane legal systems, and not the ones where "making examples" etc are part of the system.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Open-R1: an open reproduction of DeepSeek-R1 by numba888 on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @05:38AM (#42863513)
> The judges should apply the law, and the same case should ideally lead to the same verdict regardless of the judge.

hmm.. :) I like this. But the reality is very different and some factors which shouldn't matter can change the outcome dramatically. Like skin colors of defendant and judge. Pointing this out can be punished as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]