Re:Why OpenAI's $157B valuation misreads AI's future (Oct 2024)
by SlightlyLeftPad on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @12:05AM
(#42849028)
I’m not saying it doesn’t have value, but it’s not worth my time to spend 20 minutes to prompt engineer a tool to write me a plagiarized document I could write myself in 20 minutes? Why would I invest my time into using a tool that undermines my own value? What’s the value prop for me?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why OpenAI's $157B valuation misreads AI's future (Oct 2024)
by handfuloflight on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @12:06AM
(#42849030)
Your inability to find value propositions and use cases is your issue.
Re:Why OpenAI's $157B valuation misreads AI's future (Oct 2024)
by SlightlyLeftPad on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @12:13AM
(#42849063)
K, just keep this conversation in mind in a decade or two when you realize that your input is the product, not what you got out of it.
Re:Why OpenAI's $157B valuation misreads AI's future (Oct 2024)
by handfuloflight on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @12:17AM
(#42849087)
Oh yeah—tell that to my AI pipelines on my local compute.
Re:Why OpenAI's $157B valuation misreads AI's future (Oct 2024)
by SlightlyLeftPad on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @12:26AM
(#42849140)
Local pipelines are great and all for now but there’s practically no way those will be able to keep up with server based models long-term. If those are useful for you today, that’s great.
Re:Why OpenAI's $157B valuation misreads AI's future (Oct 2024)
by handfuloflight on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @12:31AM
(#42849168)
Right and those "server based models" can be deployed by me or my team, on clusters we own.