Re:Are Americans' perceptions of the economy and crime broken?
by cafard on Monday January 27, 2025 @04:43PM
(#42845995)
As a subscriber to the (print) Post and steady reader, the decision not to endorse struck me as bizarrely coy. Day after day the A section was full of news articles that more or less labeled Donald Trump a fool, liar, and dangerous man. Yes, OK, so now why not endorse his opponent?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Are Americans' perceptions of the economy and crime broken?
by Gothmog69 on Monday January 27, 2025 @04:53PM
(#42846108)
It was meant to increase trust. Why should a trump supporter trust a newspaper that endorses his opponent? Better to leave that up to the reader.
Re:Are Americans' perceptions of the economy and crime broken?
by cafard on Monday January 27, 2025 @08:30PM
(#42847912)
Now I just have to imagine a Trump supporter who trusts The Washington Post. It was not always easy to find a Bush 41 supporter who trusted it.
Re:Are Americans' perceptions of the economy and crime broken?
by llamaimperative on Tuesday January 28, 2025 @07:18AM
(#42851500)
Increase trust by a last minute break with tradition forced by executives who then had their sibling rocket company (Blue Origin) go meet, the same day, with the candidate they just helped?