Re:DeepSeek-R1
by wrasee on Saturday January 25, 2025 @07:39AM
(#42821289)
If someone replies to your comment then I think it’s entirely fair that they take your point in the context in which it was intended. Otherwise, if they are not interested in the point then simply don’t reply to it.
No-one enjoys being taken out context.
But I do accept that given the hostility of replies I didn’t make my point very effectively. I think most simply took at it as an attack on DeepSeek (and yes, the comment was not very favourable to them).
In a nutshell, the original comment was that it’s surprising a small team like DeepSeek can compete with OpenAI. Another reply was more succinct than mine: that it’s not surprising since following is a lot easier than doing SOTA work. That’s especially true in a field where so much research is being shared.
No-one enjoys being taken out context.
But I do accept that given the hostility of replies I didn’t make my point very effectively. I think most simply took at it as an attack on DeepSeek (and yes, the comment was not very favourable to them).
In a nutshell, the original comment was that it’s surprising a small team like DeepSeek can compete with OpenAI. Another reply was more succinct than mine: that it’s not surprising since following is a lot easier than doing SOTA work. That’s especially true in a field where so much research is being shared.