Yep - I don't get a ton of value out of autocompletions, but I get decent value from asking an LLM how they would approach more complex functions or features. I rarely get code back that I can copy/paste, but reading their output is something I can react to - whether it is good or bad, just having a starting point speeds up the design of new features vs. me burning time creating my first/worst draft. And that is the goal here, isn't it? To get some productivity gains?

So maybe it is just a difference in perspective? Even incorrect code and bad ideas can still be helpful. It is only useless if you expect them to hand you working code.