News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Storm Worm botnet cracked wide open by zby on Saturday January 10, 2009 @10:57AM (#427997)
This is interesting. They claim they cannot unleash their cleaning program at large - because it would change the infected machines in an unsolicited way. The infected machines are used as a tool for criminal actions - isn't it an obligation of anyone, capable of doing that, to stop them? Maybe they could gather evidence from spam blockers and only clean the computers that were reported as spam tools?
Re:Storm Worm botnet cracked wide open by dhimes on Saturday January 10, 2009 @11:17AM (#428014)
That's what I was thinking when I made my "eminent domain" comment. At what point can the government legally step in and say, "in the interest of the public welfare, we're going to let this happen?"
Re:Storm Worm botnet cracked wide open by newt0311 on Saturday January 10, 2009 @02:27PM (#428229)
The government (most of them anyway) can do this almost immedeately as nearly all of them have some clause allowing action in the event of known criminal activity (whether they will after this goes through all the beaucracy is a different matter). The question with the parent is would private citizens be within their rights to do something like that. To that, the answer is, for the most part, no. I do not know of any countries (except palestine) which condone vigilantee justice.
Re:Storm Worm botnet cracked wide open by newt0311 on Saturday January 10, 2009 @02:24PM (#428220)
Not quite. What you are referring to is vigilantee justice and most countries are not very fond of it (for good reason).