News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on NFL teams can't use Bluesky. Parent comment

Re:NFL teams can't use Bluesky by verdverm on Wednesday January 22, 2025 @02:26PM (#42796524)
My understanding is that your content gets stored in your database, regardless of PDS host. Bluesky hosts most PDS

I believe each user gets a dedicated sqlite database, or at least a dedicated repo. I recall reading somewhere about the implementation moving to use sqlite

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NFL teams can't use Bluesky by PaulHoule on Wednesday January 22, 2025 @02:45PM (#42796726)
"My" instance of sqlite that they host?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NFL teams can't use Bluesky by verdverm on Wednesday January 22, 2025 @02:54PM (#42796812)
yeah, that is my understanding, if I understand your question correctly.

Of course it is all hidden from view, there is a merkle tree involved, and you probably want to use a higher level client than SQL

This talks about why SQLite and not Postgres

https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/discussions/2287

Repository spec:

https://atproto.com/specs/repository

Small program to export:

https://github.com/bluesky-social/cookbook/tree/main/go-repo...

[ Parent | on HN ]