News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Met Paul Graham Once by mgraczyk on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @01:18AM (#42777151)
Well i meant "group" as in an actual group of people who are all doing roughly the same thing at the same time, like the previous generation of robber barons.

But even in this case, I could make a pretty strong case that Salk was less important for the eradication of Polio than Gates, and that Curie will likely be less important in the long run than Zuckerberg on healthcare and biosciences, and a weaker but reasonable case that Borlaug will be less impactful on human survivability with increasing population than Musk.

Re:I Met Paul Graham Once by probablybetter on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @06:54AM (#42779143)
no. just NO. look at maps of polio proliferation before/after Jonas Salk, the frikkin guy who DISCOVERED/CREATED the polio vaccine, and then look at maps related to Gates work, which, while admirable, bears no comparison from the night-vs-day world of pre-polio-vaccine vs post-vaccine. Wards of people in iron-lung machines staring at mirrors on the ceiling. It was before your time, but this is no excuse for spouting total nonsense.
Re:I Met Paul Graham Once by mgraczyk on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @11:55AM (#42782338)
You might be right. It is possible that Gates is merely one of the most positively impactful human beings, rather than the absolute most positively impactful.
Re:I Met Paul Graham Once by gooosle on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @12:22PM (#42782732)
It's possible that you merely need to take Bill Gates balls out of your mouth to be able to make a coherent argument.
Re:I Met Paul Graham Once by gooosle on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @10:25AM (#42781112)
You can't make a case for any of that. But go ahead and try.