Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users
by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday January 20, 2025 @12:42PM
(#42771077)
Sure, the loophole is a part of the law, as I (and others) stated. Congress passed the law, which included a simple and easy way for a president to suspend it once of 90 day, with weak and unenforceable requirements to invoke it. Given that this is an unusual clause to have in a law, I feel comfortable calling it a loophole.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users
by JumpCrisscross on Monday January 20, 2025 @01:56PM
(#42771821)
> the loophole is a part of the law
That's not a loophole. It was intentionally designed the way it's been written to be used the way Trump is using it--to give the President leverage and the ability to save face for Beijing.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users
by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday January 20, 2025 @03:07PM
(#42772522)
You're saying it is not possible to build a loophole into a law.
I'm saying that it is.