Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users
by speff on Sunday January 19, 2025 @08:25PM
(#42763979)
§ 2(G)(3) A/B seem more like OR conditions to me, not AND. I don't think Bytedance can get out of it by the president saying they're not a threat.
[1]: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521... Ctrl+F "(3) FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATION"
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users
by hot_gril on Monday January 20, 2025 @07:37PM
(#42774924)
Maybe I'm in over my head, but that's how I interpreted it too. It's annoying how every news source and even Wikipedia doesn't make it clear what this law does.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users
by speff on Wednesday January 22, 2025 @09:41PM
(#42800059)
I'd just recommend reading the full bill. It's not that hard to understand and it's fairly short. I used a GPT to parse sections which seemed a bit complicated
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users
by JumpCrisscross on Sunday January 19, 2025 @09:15PM
(#42764298)
> but § 2(G)(3)(B)(ii) indicates that it is within the president's discretion to not enforce
Wrong.
That § lets the President designate other entities. That’s why we wrote “any of” at the top—Bytedance, TikTok or any of the things the President may designate.
There are some paperwork qualifiers that for certain have not been met (the not-yet president almost certainly could not have briefed Congress as president 30 days prior) -- but they seem trivial to satisfy, and it would be pointless to initiate enforcement actions for an event nobody intends to follow through on