News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by roca on Sunday January 19, 2025 @02:34PM (#42760836)
With or without Tiktok, the USA is nowhere near as restrictive as the CCP. The users who tried RedNote discovered that very quickly.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by VectorLock on Sunday January 19, 2025 @04:01PM (#42761765)
People trying to act like this Chinese controlled vehicle supports free speech is so weird to me. They're not "censoring" anything - they're using it as a straight unimpeded funnel to subvert the west.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by vkou on Sunday January 19, 2025 @06:25PM (#42763215)
> they're using it as a straight unimpeded funnel to subvert the west.

And Fox News is also a foreign-owned straight unimpeded funnel used to subvert democracy, which sows division and conflict in our society.

It's done orders of magnitude more harm to it than TikTok ever has.

When are we banning it?

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by seanmcdirmid on Sunday January 19, 2025 @06:28PM (#42763236)
Rupert Murdoch got US citizenship because of foreign ownership rules. From his wiki page:

> On 4 September 1985, Murdoch became a naturalized citizen to satisfy the legal requirement that only US citizens were permitted to own US television stations.

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by vkou on Sunday January 19, 2025 @06:47PM (#42763352)
I am pretty sure a Chinese-American owner would be considered Chinese for the conversation about foreign control over TikTok.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by seanmcdirmid on Sunday January 19, 2025 @10:16PM (#42764635)
China doesn’t allow for or recognize dual citizenship, so it doesn’t matter unless they also gave up their Chinese citizenship (rumor has it the CPC relaxed this rule for a certain snowboarder). But ya, that Murdoch is also Australian is probably benign.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by vkou on Monday January 20, 2025 @05:11PM (#42773699)
Nothing about Murdoch's politics is benign. They've done more damage to democracy worldwide, but particularly in the US, than China ever will.

Speaking of hostile foreigners, a prominent South African was just giving the crowd a few Nazi salutes at the inauguration. Is that also benign? At what exact point do we start observing that the enemies to democracy are inside the house?

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by seanmcdirmid on Monday January 20, 2025 @05:39PM (#42773949)
Ok, Murdoch’s Australian citizenship would be seen as benign, unless you are going to tell me that Australians are as dangerous as Murdoch in general?
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by vkou on Monday January 20, 2025 @06:22PM (#42774359)
They are about as dangerous as Chinese Americans, which is to say, not at all.

Particular people are problematic. But you can only judge that by actions, not by their country of birth.

Which is what makes this foreign manipulation rhetoric and ban rubbish. It refuses to identify what the bad actions it's trying to protect us from are, it's just a lazy, prejudiced rubric that gives the most egregious ones a free pass, because they have the right color stripes on their pin.

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by seanmcdirmid on Monday January 20, 2025 @11:52PM (#42776755)
I already mentioned that dual citizenship isn’t possible for Chinese. There is no person over 18 that holds Chinese and American citizenship, but you keep somehow ignoring that. Any Chinese can get American citizenship, get rid of Chinese citizenship, and buy a tv station in the states, the process is straightforward, and they won’t deny you because your ethnicity is Han or Hui or whatever.
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users by vkou on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @02:21AM (#42777403)
I doubt China's unwillingness to recognize dual citizenship would be the problem.