News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by Lionga on Sunday January 19, 2025 @12:32PM (#42759215)
HN ist also addictive for many people. So lets also ban it, ok?
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by agumonkey on Sunday January 19, 2025 @12:34PM (#42759245)
There's no endless stream of short videos. That's the hook of these apps. A slow, bare, text only website is probably low on the dopamine trigger scale. Worst case scenario you're now addicted to post graduate conversations.
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by amazingamazing on Sunday January 19, 2025 @11:11PM (#42764905)
Text can be addictive though, silly and arbitrary distinction.
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by agumonkey on Monday January 20, 2025 @04:08AM (#42766554)
Hmm I'm no neurologist but I would place solid money on the fact that it really doesn't activate the same neurological circuits. Saying this because I had issues there and reading really change my brain patterns tangibly.
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by pavlov on Sunday January 19, 2025 @12:41PM (#42759325)
We ban chemicals that are designed to be addictive to humans. The exception are substances that are addictive but also have high medical utility. Those are carefully controlled (sometimes less carefully of course — see OxyContin).

It doesn’t seem impossible to make similar value judgments about social media apps, but clearly it’s even harder than with chemicals.

HN ranks fairly low on the "designed to be addictive" scale, and fairly high on the utility scale. With TikTok, it's obvious that it's off the charts on the former while the latter is a very complicated value judgment.

Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by loloquwowndueo on Sunday January 19, 2025 @12:35PM (#42759254)
Plenty of articles documenting how TikTok is designed to be addictive. Show me equivalents for HN.
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by a12k on Sunday January 19, 2025 @12:45PM (#42759360)
Even that is not entirely relevant. I think the criteria here are likely actual addiction combined with harm from that addiction combined with scale of that harm. So even if we showed that HN was addictive, the harm and scale are so low that banning it shouldn't even be a conversation. Under the same framework, we have TikTok, which combines an algorithm designed for addiction, actual or imminent harm from a foreign power, and probably the most massive scale possible. So it seems within the realm of possibility that banning TikTok should be a discussion.
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by yoyohello13 on Sunday January 19, 2025 @01:01PM (#42759555)
Yes! That sound good to me actually.
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by electrondood on Sunday January 19, 2025 @12:58PM (#42759515)
HN is not intentionally engineered to be as addictive as possible now, is it?
Re:TikTok Shut Down: Data Shows 85% Drop in US Access (and S... by dangus on Sunday January 19, 2025 @12:41PM (#42759316)
You're looking at this in a binary way but there's a spectrum of addictiveness. Some things are a little bit addictive, some things are more addictive, and some things are intentionally designed to be addictive.

Sure, there's some individual out there who spends 8 hours a day on HN and is completely addicted to it. But there are a much larger porportion of users on other platforms that are at that high level of addiction, because those platforms are designed to be addictive.

Scrolling apps don't want you to leave. Ever. In contrast, HN stops you from commenting if you keep doing it too fast.

Quick-access video and audio is particularly psycologically impactful.