News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Forgejo: A self-hosted lightweight software forge by nirui on Sunday January 19, 2025 @08:42AM (#42756865)
Many open source developers has misread the room and thinking the environment is still like it was 15~20 years ago where open source software were the works of hobbyists who has a well-paid day job and only here for street credit.

You know who read the room correctly? GitLab. They've found a balanced way to offer their product under an open source scheme while keeping their lights on. They've earned trust as well as income, that's a job well done.

If one wants to live off of their open source work, then they need to run it as a business and perform appropriate business tricks. Otherwise their own effort may one day become their own rip-off. Not saying anything sinister, but fairness is a balancing game, if you hard work don't treat you well, then it's unfair too.

Re:Forgejo: A self-hosted lightweight software forge by plagiarist on Sunday January 19, 2025 @09:30AM (#42757290)
GitLab has collected a few severe CVEs. I would choose "v4 final final actually final" folders as a versioning scheme before I used them. It is surprising to me that they have any users at all.
Re:Forgejo: A self-hosted lightweight software forge by fluoridation on Sunday January 19, 2025 @01:05PM (#42759603)
What does that have to do with whether it's a successful business?
Re:Forgejo: A self-hosted lightweight software forge by evanelias on Wednesday January 22, 2025 @08:05PM (#42799412)
GitLab isn't profitable yet, at least on a GAAP basis. They're definitely moving in that direction, and I hope they'll get there, but IMO it's a bit early to put them on a pedestal.