News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by elicksaur on Saturday January 18, 2025 @09:35AM (#42748643)
How do you validate these classifications?
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by jeswin on Saturday January 18, 2025 @09:44AM (#42748712)
Isn't it easier and cheaper to validate than to classify (requires expensive engineers)? I mean the skill is not as expensive - many companies do this at scale.
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by scarface_74 on Saturday January 18, 2025 @09:47AM (#42748732)
You need a domain expert either way. I mentioned in another reply that one of my niches is implementing call centers with Amazon Connect and Amazon Lex (the NLP engine).

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42748189

I don’t know the domain beforehand they are working in, I do validation testing with them.

Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by segmondy on Saturday January 18, 2025 @12:38PM (#42749924)
The same way you validate it if you didn't use an LLM.
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by bugglebeetle on Saturday January 18, 2025 @12:53PM (#42750011)
The same way you check performance for any problem like this: by creating one or more manually-labeled test datasets, randomly sampled from the target data and looking at the resulting precision, recall, f-scores etc. LLMs change pretty much nothing about evaluation for most NLP tasks.