Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage for shutdown

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by gwbas1c on Friday January 17, 2025 @01:46PM (#42741853)

To oversimplify:

You can say whatever you want on a telephone call.

BUT:

The telephone network is regulated. Your cell phone must comply with FCC regulations. You personally may have a restraining order that prohibits you from calling certain people.

IE, if a phone is found to violate FCC rules, pulling it from the market has little to do with the first amendment.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by DangitBobby on Friday January 17, 2025 @01:49PM (#42741875)

If these FCC rules were designed specifically with the intent to suppress speech of certain parties, they could be found in violation of your first amendment rights if challenged. IMO the ruling does not bother to examine whether the motivation of drafting the Act was to suppress speech.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by pantalaimon on Friday January 17, 2025 @01:51PM (#42741892)

The FCC doesn't make rules based on who owns the telephone though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by SkyPuncher on Friday January 17, 2025 @02:16PM (#42742141)

Actually, they kind of do.

> US bans sale of Huawei, ZTE tech amid security fears

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63764450

This was an FCC rule

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by insane_dreamer on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:32PM (#42745856)

A better analogy are TV stations, which cannot be owned by a foreign entity, and why Murdoch became a US citizen (or he would not have been able to own Fox).

[ Parent | on HN ]