News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by kube-system on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:38AM (#42739914)
No, X doesn't have a corporate governance structure that requires Chinese government control, because it is a US company.

Companies in China (and especially those of prominence) have formal structures and regulations that require them to cooperate with the government, and sometimes require the companies to allow the government to intervene in operations if necessary.

It is not possible for a CCP official to show up to a board meeting at X and direct the company to take some action, because that isn't how US corporations work.

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by gWPVhyxPHqvk on Friday January 17, 2025 @12:36PM (#42740926)
A CCP official could show up at a Tesla board meeting and announce they're going to seize Gigafactory Shanghai unless Musk takes down some content on X. There doesn't seem to be much of a difference.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by kube-system on Friday January 17, 2025 @12:54PM (#42741162)
Tesla is quite notable as the only foreign automaker which China has allowed to operate independently in China. All of the rest of them were forced to joint venture with 51%+ control being handed over to a Chinese domestic company. So, really it's pretty surprising that they haven't done that even before Musk owned X.

But regardless, there is a huge difference between a request and actually having managerial authority -- the most obvious being that someone with managerial authority can simply do whatever they want without trying to compel someone else. Also, X, being subject to US law, must comply with that no matter what consequences Musk is threatened with. So, any threats may have limits in what they can practically accomplish.