News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by Zigurd on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:44AM (#42738841)
You are assuming a lot about supposed evidence nobody has said anything specific about. One shouldn't also assume people in Congress know how to evaluate any evidence. Nor justices, based on the questions they asked.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by tptacek on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:45AM (#42738863)
As a matter of political science and public choice theory, the legislature is the branch of government most trusted to collect information and make these kinds of deliberations.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by coldpie on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:52AM (#42739001)
You might buy that, but I don't. Unless they can actually put forward publicly compelling evidence of a national security risk, this can only be seen as a handout to Facebook by the government. This saga just gives more evidence that the US government exists primarily to serve the interests of US's oligarch class. Aside for those oligarchs, it does nothing to serve US citizens' interests.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by kjkjadksj on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:39AM (#42739931)
Would you call Marjorie Taylor Greene a qualified and trusted investigator for the american people? I sure wouldn’t. Talking about what the legislature is supposed to be is irrelevant. What the legislature actually is is relevant.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by morkalork on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:48AM (#42738917)
Congress members speak of space lasers and weather control... I'm not sure they're competent as a whole. Actually, it reminds me of the Russian guy that always spouts nonsense about nuking UK into oblivion, and that theory that he's just kept around to make the real evil people look sane.