News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? R. A. Fi... by dmos62 on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:39AM (#42738727)
My take is that it takes only a small percentage of people to be toxic, for the lack of a better term, for most of the conversation to be toxic. E.g. someone acts inappropriately, then a few people overreact (i.e. follow suit), then whoever isn't interested in thinking in baser terms altogether skips the conversation: ergo, the conversation is dominated by the outraged, divisive minority.
Re:How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? R. A. Fi... by Ar-Curunir on Friday January 17, 2025 @06:54PM (#42744492)
Have you read any thread here on IQ, or immigration, or outsourcing? You can find the most vile, bottom-of-the-barrel opinions there, and the mods don’t give a shit, yet here you have a comment calling out misrepresentation (at best) of facts about eugenics and suddenly dang feels the need to sweep in and tone-police that?
Re:How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? R. A. Fi... by dmos62 on Saturday January 18, 2025 @05:30AM (#42747337)
I don't think I have. In those other cases, do you think that dang is being biased towards certain causes, or that he failed to moderate for some more benign reason?