You can't use your $6,299.00 Camera as a Webcam. That will be $5

Re:You can't use your $6,299.00 Camera as a Webcam. That wil... by contrast on Friday January 17, 2025 @06:16AM (#42736363)

The thread is about bad things because of tax policy, your post is about a good thing because of health policy - but you don’t say it’s a good thing, or that it’s about heath not taxes.

The post pointing this out has different content to yours, which reads as if your meaning is “this reminds me of another bad thing caused by tax policies” - even if that’s not what you meant.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You can't use your $6,299.00 Camera as a Webcam. That wil... by umanwizard on Friday January 17, 2025 @07:28AM (#42736816)

> you don’t say it’s a good thing

But I also never said OP’s anecdote was a bad thing. (Why shouldn’t countries be able to tax video cameras coming in…). What’s the difference?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You can't use your $6,299.00 Camera as a Webcam. That wil... by jeffhuys on Friday January 17, 2025 @09:35AM (#42737910)

You can’t win arguments on the internet. Best case: they ghost you. Cowards, I say!

[ Parent | on HN ]