Re:In the Belly of the MrBeast
by ahmeneeroe-v2 on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @12:53PM
(#42700970)
You don't need to write the treatise because the era of that kind of "logic" winning elections is over. (ie the left being able to label whole political movements as bad because certain bad people associate themselves with it)
Re:In the Belly of the MrBeast
by standardUser on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @02:34PM
(#42702580)
Who are the good white supremacists?
Re:In the Belly of the MrBeast
by ahmeneeroe-v2 on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @04:35PM
(#42704212)
yeah so you're doing the same thing. the era when people fall for the rhetorical trick of labeling a group as [really bad thing] in order to make them not want to associate with that group is over.
you'll just have to compete on ideas instead of word games now.
Re:In the Belly of the MrBeast
by llamaimperative on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @01:30PM
(#42701614)
I didn't label a whole movement as bad, ya goofball. Well except for neo-Nazism and theocracy, the latter of which is explicitly counter to the US Constitution and the former is... well... you can defend it if you'd like.
I said extreme ideologies (including the two I mentioned) are bad, and there's an asymmetry in their representation and proximity to power on the different ends of the political spectrum.
Re:In the Belly of the MrBeast
by throaway89 on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @02:35PM
(#42702591)
And is also an incel...hard for me to imagine someone that Trump would despise more than a guy who can't get laid.
Re:In the Belly of the MrBeast
by llamaimperative on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @03:00PM
(#42702985)
Well it’s apparent at this point literally anything is acceptable so long as they flatter his sensitive ego.
Re:In the Belly of the MrBeast
by throaway89 on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @03:01PM
(#42703005)
I would suggest the opposite (inverse?): anything is acceptable to Nick Fuentes as long as it increases his chances of getting laid.
I don't need to write a treatise to explain why this is bad.