Of course very few people earn $1.5M/year. That's my point -- the poster I was replying to was naively thinking they could just work hard for a tech company and save for 10 years and then live off the passive income of the saved investment, which is silly.
The rest of the numbers were conservative figures I chose. $5mm to retire, 20% saved while working, $150k/year passive income. The whole point is that what he's describing is pretty unrealistic.
How did you choose "20% saved while working" as a number? Why not 80%?
I mean, you’d be terrorizing the economy, but that’s also what you do when you eat food grown and prepared by people with inadequate labor protections, so why not take the red pill and double down on being a true slave-supported neo-Athenian?
- Very few people earn $1.5M/year
- Saving 20% implies that you're spending ~$1M/year while working, so $150k/year in retirement would not be appealing
Did the LLM pick the numbers for you?