Jason - I thought this was a great story and a lesson to be learned for hustlers who want to know how to stand out from the wannapreneurs. But I also felt it implied an assumption that technical people don't need to prove anything. It gets very tiring reading articles that imply that tech people are all highly valuable, and that business people should feel lucky to be chosen as their partners. At our company, Yotam and I accomplished mountains of work while our first 3 tech-founder candidates produced nothing and wasted our time.

It's also terribly inaccurate to say that "most technical people can, over time, "figure out the business stuff" to a far greater degree than most business people can "figure out the technical stuff". If "figuring it out" is akin to having a basic understanding, I think many great business founders have proven they can learn to code on a basic level. Similarly, developers may also learn the basics of business development, sales or fundraising by reading some articles. And, maybe one more than the other. But just as figuring out the basics of coding does not make you a valuable developer, learning the basics of business does not suddenly empower a person with the ability to ask the right questions, communicate clearly, create mutual value between partners, close a sale, negotiate terms, save a furious client, and so on.

Being moderate at any of these things does not a great founder, or company, make. Implying that techs can somehow become good at these things in droves, or easily at all, is drastically underestimating what a true business leader is capable of.

I get your point. But I'd argue that a shortage in technical talent doesn't logically imply great engineers are more abundant than great sales/business people. It's just that there are probably just more mediocre business people than there are mediocre engineers.

At the pure idea phase, some degree of technical talent, however minor, is huge leverage, esp. if whoever it is can prototype something to a point of raising seed capital. At this point, incredible engineering skills aren't needed, but some solid technical background is important. That said, the degree to which engineering talent is required is really product dependent (as well as space dependent--i.e., consumer v enterprise).

Historically, technically minded folks have been exploited by business minded folks far more frequently than the other way around. While the most recent bend towards "engineer supremacy" may be objectively unhealthy, in the overall scheme of things, I think it is a positive development that will eventually lead us to a more balanced frame of mind than before the engineer supremacy phase started.

(and this is coming from a business side guy)