News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Case for Letting Malibu Burn (1995) by __loam on Sunday January 12, 2025 @03:21PM (#42676567)
Really hard to make the argument for this politically when the state is also facing a housing crisis. Unfortunately, a lot of undeveloped land is also prone to wildfire. The solution is zoning relaxation and building dense but there's also a lot of resistance to that.
Re:The Case for Letting Malibu Burn (1995) by Analemma_ on Sunday January 12, 2025 @03:32PM (#42676656)
Newsom is proposing waiving CEQA for rebuilding destroyed homes in the wildfire zone, but only for low-density structures, which makes me want to scream until my throat bleeds. California infallibly manages to zero in on the worst possible solution; waive CEQA either entirely or not at all, and let the Palisades homeowners wait for their decade of environmental review like the rest of us have to.
Re:The Case for Letting Malibu Burn (1995) by bcrosby95 on Sunday January 12, 2025 @10:43PM (#42679866)
I think CEQA only applies if you aren't building a similarly sized/footprinted structure, which seems reasonable enough. So I don't see why it would need to be explicitly waived, except to give people with the means to to rebuild bigger/etc.