News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C++26: A Placeholder with No Name by maccard on Saturday January 11, 2025 @12:24PM (#42667336)
Im as shocked as you are that people rely on textual representations and ignore all the powerful tooling available to them for understanding code.

Every editor I use has tools that will provide this information in a single keystroke, macro or cluck. If you actively choose to avoid using tools to read code, I shouldn’t suffer for it.

Re:C++26: A Placeholder with No Name by mgaunard on Saturday January 11, 2025 @12:31PM (#42667391)
if you need tools it just means the code is sub-par
Re:C++26: A Placeholder with No Name by maccard on Saturday January 11, 2025 @12:55PM (#42667596)
Grep is a tool. But if I grep foo, it can’t tell me the difference between a function called foo, a variable called foo, or any other types that may have a foo, or a comment with foo in it. Even vscode can do “show me all uses of foo” in a single click, and be perfectly correct,
Re:C++26: A Placeholder with No Name by mgaunard on Saturday January 11, 2025 @02:32PM (#42668331)
It's not perfectly correct, and that actually what makes it dangerous.
Re:C++26: A Placeholder with No Name by orf on Saturday January 11, 2025 @05:25PM (#42669433)
That take is so comically nonsensical I question why you’d even contribute it.

I have no doubt you read and write code without any tools.