Re:Finland's Zero Homeless Strategy: Lessons from a Success ...
by watwut on Saturday January 11, 2025 @11:04AM
(#42666759)
Historically shared living was standard. You had multigenerational households and such too. It was not seen as humiliating, but as normal.
It has its issues and is definitely not ideal, but whether you accept these has less to do with age and more to do with culture and economics.
Re:Finland's Zero Homeless Strategy: Lessons from a Success ...
by lifestyleguru on Saturday January 11, 2025 @12:54PM
(#42667593)
How do you start sharing multigenerational household when you're a foreigner hundreds kilometers away from any family? Culture and economics might mutually agree that you are obsolete and should eliminate yourself, would you comply?
Re:Finland's Zero Homeless Strategy: Lessons from a Success ...
by Symbiote on Saturday January 11, 2025 @07:21PM
(#42670079)
Indefinitely, if you can't afford to live alone. It's obviously not something you'd want to do, but it's much better than being homeless.
I've shared a house with people in their 40s (or more) when I was in my 20s in London. I'm sure they would have preferred their own place, but it was much, much cheaper for them to share.
Re:Finland's Zero Homeless Strategy: Lessons from a Success ...
by lifestyleguru on Sunday January 12, 2025 @10:09AM
(#42674084)
If someone in their 40s ends up or insist on living in shared accommodation in London, it's probably a hidden message from their own destiny.
> It's not too difficult to rent a room in a shared house/apartment as a single person
In Berlin or Munich absolutely not, even shared accommodation have some absurd castings. Some people really smell their advantage and squeeze every drop of humiliation they can.