Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs by mitthrowaway2 on Friday January 10, 2025 @05:48PM (#42661190)

Is that really different than traditional Western societies? Medieval European societies had complex systems governing shared rights and ownership of common grazing lands and forests, for example. Those rights changed over time (such as through the Inclosure Acts) but it's not a concept alien to western societies.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs by AlotOfReading on Friday January 10, 2025 @05:58PM (#42661303)

There's probably an interesting comparative discussion that I'm not remotely qualified to have on medieval European property rights, but there's enough history of colonial settlers wildly misunderstanding indigenous property systems that I don't know a better word than "alien".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs by ethbr1 on Friday January 10, 2025 @06:27PM (#42661574)

"Misunderstanding" seems perhaps overly charitable to the colonial settlers.

Possessing of enough military force to ignore others rights would be more historically descriptive.

Even if they had fully understood all the nuances of indigenous property rights, they still would have stolen the land. Confusion was just a fig leaf.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs by ponow on Friday January 10, 2025 @10:33PM (#42663066)

Developing defence capacity is a basic responsibility. Humans can scream foul if they lose out to machine hybrids or extraterrestrials.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs by 9dev on Saturday January 11, 2025 @02:48AM (#42664135)

So what, it’s your own fault if someone assaults you and takes away your things?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs by ethbr1 on Saturday January 11, 2025 @09:06PM (#42670620)

I mean, kind of?

Not in a morally absolving the attacker way.

But in a you had agency and chose to underinvest in defense way.

That said, it's pretty unlikely the rest of the world could have defended against a technologically advanced Europe / Middle East / China, at their respective peaks, and especially after transoceanic sail enabled cross-sea logistics.

[ Parent | on HN ]