Re:Lightning captured at 7,207 images per second
by reustle on Thursday July 19, 2012 @11:00AM
(#4266273)
Every time I see that picture it makes me hate Instagram a little bit more.
Re:Lightning captured at 7,207 images per second
by mhurron on Thursday July 19, 2012 @01:17PM
(#4267028)
Ya, is there a clean version of that picture somewhere?
Re:Lightning captured at 7,207 images per second
by thisisblurry on Thursday July 19, 2012 @01:14PM
(#4267005)
Any reason in particular for that? Seems a bit harsh.
Re:Lightning captured at 7,207 images per second
by sp332 on Thursday July 19, 2012 @03:04PM
(#4267557)
It removes all the fine features from the funnel, most of the color and contrast information, and shrinks the resolution. It made this photo worse in every way.
Re:Lightning captured at 7,207 images per second
by thisisblurry on Thursday July 19, 2012 @03:47PM
(#4267747)
To be fair, that image wouldn't exist (nor would we be having this discussion) otherwise as it wouldn't have been published to Instagram. I can't comment in regards to the photographer's filter preference though...
Re:Lightning captured at 7,207 images per second
by sp332 on Thursday July 19, 2012 @04:26PM
(#4267903)
Maybe the resolution would have been the same. But it's possible to upload a photo in Instagram without stopping to apply a filter, isn't it?
Re:Lightning captured at 7,207 images per second
by thisisblurry on Thursday July 19, 2012 @05:24PM
(#4268136)
Nope, you can go sans filter. It's actually the first option - you have to scroll past it to get to the modifying filters. You can see it in step 2 here: http://help.instagram.com/customer/portal/articles/168150-ta...
http://www.travelerstoday.com/articles/2357/20120718/nyc-sto...