News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I had to take down my course-swapping site or be expelled by pbhjpbhj on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @09:03PM (#42640822)
Surely they could refer the enquiry to the bar association or something in this jurisdiction.

How would the lawyer even know, without conversation, that there was a conflict?

Re:I had to take down my course-swapping site or be expelled by creer on Thursday January 09, 2025 @12:46AM (#42642021)
> Surely they could refer the enquiry to the bar association or something in this jurisdiction.

They might but in many cases wouldn't even do that because they still wouldn't get paid for it. Doesn't matter, you don't need them for that.

Re:I had to take down my course-swapping site or be expelled by DannyBee on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @12:37PM (#42782923)
To be fair, in many cases, they can be held responsible for whether you refer people to the right place.
Re:I had to take down my course-swapping site or be expelled by DannyBee on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @12:36PM (#42782908)
They can basically say "i can't speak to you". More than even that is tricky.

As for the latter, that's why i said "when they know of a non waivable conflict".

Emphasis being "know of".

Here, they know they have a conflict - they have a client, it's not this person, and they know their client will be adversarial to this person. They aren't even part of a law firm that represents multiple clients regularly or something like that where sometimes the conflicts might be waivable (often not, but still)

This is a very very easy case.

If they don't know they have a conflict, sure, they can have a conversation for the purposes of understanding if they have a conflict.

That's not this case though!