The Future of Htmx

Re:The Future of Htmx by yawaramin on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @12:38PM (#42625070)

Conceptually htmx is closer to Fetch API + set innerHTML than it is to a 'frontend library' like React.js. Do people complain that setting innerHTML from JavaScript breaks screen readers? Of course not, they set up aria-live regions correctly as shown in plenty of accessibility documentation. htmx can't make the decision for you what your aria-live regions are and what text should be read out when the content changes, you need to decide that yourself.

EDIT: here's the one mention of `aria-live` in the React.js codebase defining it as a valid ARIA attribute for ReactDOM: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Afacebook%2Freact%20%22ari...

The one mention in Vuejs core to define its accepted values: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Avuejs%2Fcore%20%22aria-li...

The one mention in the Svelte runtime defining its accepted values: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Asveltejs%2Fsvelte%20%22ar...

Do people go after these frameworks saying they need to handle breaking screenreaders by dynamically updating content? Of course not. Setting live regions is the responsibility of the web page creator, not the framework.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future of Htmx by simonw on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @08:48PM (#42630032)

Yes, I do go after those frameworks saying they need to at the very least help their users understand what they should do. I'm disappointed by any JavaScript library or framework that doesn't provide good documented examples for this, which is almost all of them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future of Htmx by yawaramin on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @10:19PM (#42630528)

> Yes, I do go after those frameworks

I'll believe that once I see you file an issue which mentions accessibility against any of the projects I linked to ;-)

https://github.com/facebook/react/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author...

https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author%3As...

https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte/issues?q=is%3Aissue+autho...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future of Htmx by nindalf on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @02:46AM (#42632011)

Simon don’t waste your time with this guy. I thought he was affiliated with htmx but he’s just some jerk off trying to prove he’s “right”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future of Htmx by yawaramin on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @08:54AM (#42634218)

I encourage you to read the guidelines and familiarize yourself with what is acceptable in HN comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future of Htmx by nindalf on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @10:25AM (#42635175)

You're right, thanks for the reminder.

Simon don’t waste your time with this guy. I thought he was affiliated with htmx but he’s just some dude trying to prove he’s “right”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future of Htmx by yawaramin on Wednesday January 08, 2025 @11:05AM (#42635587)

Being affiliated with htmx or not doesn't change basic facts about web accessibility :-D Go look at the links I posted, look for the issues people filed against the repos claiming that their dynamic content updates break screen readers. There are zero. People understand how web accessibility works and what responsibilities lie at which parts of their stack.

Now if you say that component frameworks like shadcn/ui or whatnot should implement accessible behaviours and patterns, I am 100% with you on that. But React/Vue/htmx are at a lower level, they can't decide those things for you.

EDIT: sure enough, someone filed an issue with shadcn/ui that it does not announce something properly in screenreaders: https://github.com/shadcn-ui/ui/issues/4209

[ Parent | on HN ]