Those statistics don't seem to prove what you're claiming. At all.
Even if we go with your premise (which in itself makes a whole bunch of assumptions), South Asian homicide victim rate per 100,000 people is comparable to the total rate (and for some years significantly lower):
2019: 1.77 vs 1.84 total
2020: 1.21 vs 2.01 total
2021: 1.69 vs 2.09 total
2022: 2.35 vs 2.27 total
2023: 1.38 vs 1.94 total
So even if your argument was valid (in inference, which I'm absolutely not convinced about), the data doesn't even back it, so it is at the very least unsound.
Did you confuse Indians with Southeast Asian by any chance? That group has a little higher rate of homicide victimhood, though only marginal. SE Asian people include Vietnamese, Cambodian, Thai, Indonesian, Malay, Philippine etc nationals, not Indian/Pakistani/Sri Lankan.
Even if we go with your premise (which in itself makes a whole bunch of assumptions), South Asian homicide victim rate per 100,000 people is comparable to the total rate (and for some years significantly lower):
2019: 1.77 vs 1.84 total
2020: 1.21 vs 2.01 total
2021: 1.69 vs 2.09 total
2022: 2.35 vs 2.27 total
2023: 1.38 vs 1.94 total
So even if your argument was valid (in inference, which I'm absolutely not convinced about), the data doesn't even back it, so it is at the very least unsound.
Did you confuse Indians with Southeast Asian by any chance? That group has a little higher rate of homicide victimhood, though only marginal. SE Asian people include Vietnamese, Cambodian, Thai, Indonesian, Malay, Philippine etc nationals, not Indian/Pakistani/Sri Lankan.