That's not me taking a stance on whether it's true, though. There would be a lot of fame in it for a whistleblower, but on the other hand if Google or Meta figured out a way to do it with a low chance of it being proven, why wouldn't they?
“Be part of the richest portion of the middle class and never have to worry about money again orrrrr mysteriously die 6 months from now leaving no identifiable impact”
The Previa ads were always there but that was the first time you noticed it because it was on your mind.
(To be clear, I'm not being facetious -- this is a viable possibility)
(A) Explains why you noticed the Privia. (B) Explains why you searched for something that might have triggered a Privia ad.
To a layman this might be indistinguishable from magic. So in some way maybe the phone really can read your mind :)
For more consumption.
The trouble is, what does "suddenly" and "a bunch of" mean? This doesn't sound very specific, let alone scientifically rigorous. How many ladder ads were you getting previously, and how would you know? Exactly when did the rate of such ads increase? Unless you have these details, it's highly possible you're estimating them inaccurately.
My proof? Yesterday I was driving home and I saw an old Toyota Previa minivan and thought to myself "Oh, a Previa, you don't see those very often these days." When I got home, I started scrolling through my Google News and it showed me an advert for the new Previa.
I agree with Simon: you basically aren't going to convince someone that their phone doesn't listen to you and serve you adverts based on it, because they've run into instances where it seems like it.