Re:Terence Tao: One of my papers got declined today
by bennythomsson on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @04:49PM
(#42569596)
To supply a counter viewpoint here... The opposite is the "least publishable unit" which leads to loads and loads of almost-nothing results flooding the journals and other publication outlets. It would be hard to keep up with all that if there wasn't a reasonable threshold. If anything then I find that threshold too low currently, rather than too high. The "publish or perish" principle also pushes people that way.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Terence Tao: One of my papers got declined today
by lupire on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @07:54PM
(#42570638)
That's much less of a problem than the fact that papers are such poor media for sharing knowledge. They are published too slowly to be immediately useful versus just a quick chat, and simultaneously written in too rushed a way to comprehensively educate people on progress in the field.
Re:Terence Tao: One of my papers got declined today
by ahartmetz on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @08:19PM
(#42570778)
The educational and editorial quality of papers from before 1980 or so beats just about anything published today. That is what publish or perish - impact factor - smallest publishable unit culture did.
Re:Terence Tao: One of my papers got declined today
by bennythomsson on Thursday January 02, 2025 @04:09AM
(#42572900)
> versus just a quick chat,
Everybody is free to keep a blog for this kind of informal chat/brainstorming kind of communication. Paper publications should be well-written, structured, thought-through results that make it worthwhile for the reader to spend their time. Anything else belongs to a blog post.