Re:An Unreasonable Amount of Time
by soulofmischief on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @02:36PM
(#42568603)
It's art if the artist decides it is. You don't have to agree with them, but art is not some objective form you can define, it's entirely subjective.
> Is the bow used by a violin player in itself a piece of art
A pencil is a work of art.
It's art if the viewer decides it is
What the artist thinks or desires is often irrelevant. (Edited)
Re:An Unreasonable Amount of Time
by soulofmischief on Thursday January 02, 2025 @06:45AM
(#42573635)
And what committee decided this? Who gave them the authority to decide how an artist should feel about their own work?
I can see the artistic value of the full magic act, but does that make a tool used in the act to itself be art on its own?
Is the bow used by a violin player in itself a piece of art? Perhaps it could be. But if it's burried?